19th Feb 2015, 01:07 PM | #1 |
HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: 2012 Location: UK
Posts: 318
Thanks: 56
Thanked 105 Times in 80 Posts
|
How long should I keep a split test running before the results become somewhat reliable? 100 clicks to each page? more? less? |
| |
19th Feb 2015, 03:47 PM | #2 |
Midnight Oil Warrior Join Date: 2013 Location: Bridgeport, WV.
Posts: 6,782
Thanks: 3,590
Thanked 6,601 Times in 3,490 Posts
|
As I see it... the math behind A/B testing is Bells Theorem. Mathematically speaking the theorem falls into its "best" stride right at 1000 views per side of your test. All of the numbers just fall into that sweet spot where a definitive yes or no A is better than B answer can be given. That's my answer and Im sticking to it! LOL |
Success is an ACT not an idea | |
19th Feb 2015, 09:43 PM | #3 |
Overdriven Warrior Join Date: 2014 Location: Singapore
Posts: 138
Thanks: 80
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
|
Wow. Never heard of using Bell's theorem before. That's cool! Usually I just go 100 clicks for each side.
|
19th Feb 2015, 10:53 PM | #4 | |
Midnight Oil Warrior Join Date: 2013 Location: Bridgeport, WV.
Posts: 6,782
Thanks: 3,590
Thanked 6,601 Times in 3,490 Posts
|
Notice when you go to the page it is set for? 1000 LOL Here is another link that has many different calculators: http://www.evanmiller.org/ab-testing/ including the top left one that helps you determine the sample size needed to run a decently accurate test. | |
Success is an ACT not an idea | ||
19th Feb 2015, 11:37 PM | #5 | |
HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: 2012 Location: UK
Posts: 318
Thanks: 56
Thanked 105 Times in 80 Posts
|
| |
| ||
The Following User Says Thank You to Adrianhenry For This Useful Post: |
20th Feb 2015, 04:18 AM | #6 |
Conversion Rate Optimizer Join Date: 2013 Location: Cologne
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
Ideally, you will need at least 1000 unique visitors per week to the page that you want to test - otherwise it will take too long to get a test result (many weeks). And its not just about traffic too - you need to get enough 'conversions' (sales, leads, signups, subscribers etc) to get a valid test result. Ideally you will need at least 25 conversions per test variation (50 conversions per week in total). You should also take a full week to do the test - as this will help take into account variances in traffic and differences in traffic by day (weekend versus weekday etc), and this also allows enough time for fluctuations in test results to settle down. And if you don't have enough traffic to do testing, don't give up - there are still some good ways to test with lower traffic - I created a guide on A/B testing with low traffic to help with this. Hope that helps! Good luck with your testing... |
Rich Page http://www.rich-page.com | Twitter: @richpage Author of 'Website Optimization: An Hour a Day' | |
The Following User Says Thank You to richpage75 For This Useful Post: |
21st Feb 2015, 11:25 AM | #7 |
HyperActive Warrior Join Date: 2015
Posts: 402
Thanks: 1
Thanked 64 Times in 60 Posts
|
Split test until you have enough data and then just scale the best campaign. Best regards, Affiliate Manager at CPABeyond |
22nd Feb 2015, 04:16 PM | #8 |
HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: 2012 Location: UK
Posts: 318
Thanks: 56
Thanked 105 Times in 80 Posts
| |
| |
The Following User Says Thank You to Adrianhenry For This Useful Post: |
23rd Feb 2015, 01:29 AM | #9 |
HyperActive Warrior Join Date: 2011
Posts: 249
Thanks: 2
Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
|
Test when you see clear winner. Its depend on your existing traffic. 100 visitors/clicks maybe not enough if you have 10k-20k per days. Just be practical on it.
|
| |
23rd Feb 2015, 10:24 AM | #10 | |
Midnight Oil Warrior Join Date: 2013 Location: Bridgeport, WV.
Posts: 6,782
Thanks: 3,590
Thanked 6,601 Times in 3,490 Posts
|
So I keep pretty good notation on all of the tests I run. I just went and looked over the past 300 test that I have run. 68% of these tests had an early leader. out of those 204 tests with early leaders, 172 of those ended up being losers. that means to bail on the process early would have had me place the least converting option 84% of the time. Jeeze... that's bad! LOL | |
Success is an ACT not an idea | ||
23rd Feb 2015, 01:37 PM | #11 |
Work Hard Play Hard Join Date: 2011 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 183
Thanks: 14
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
|
After I have at least 300 unique views daily, I do split testing for a month. This has generally worked out for me for my own experiences |
23rd Feb 2015, 03:18 PM | #12 | |
Midnight Oil Warrior Join Date: 2013 Location: Bridgeport, WV.
Posts: 6,782
Thanks: 3,590
Thanked 6,601 Times in 3,490 Posts
|
Right now you are split testing at 4500 impressions per side. Not a bad thing don't get me wrong. But if you mathematically only really need say 1000 per test variable, you could effectively be running 4.5 Different tests per month. Or one heck of a A B C D E F G H test LOL | |
Success is an ACT not an idea | ||
23rd Feb 2015, 10:07 PM | #13 |
Warrior Member Join Date: 2014
Posts: 24
Thanks: 14
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
I think that this is an endless game You always will compete and weed out the bad ones. You stop when you are in the range of 30% conversion rate.
|
23rd Feb 2015, 10:21 PM | #14 |
internetmarketingblog101 Join Date: 2014 Location: Virginia - USA
Posts: 820
Thanks: 201
Thanked 292 Times in 232 Posts
|
The more the better! .. and as some recommended, at least 1000 clicks. Then track every single thing and look at the numbers to see what's working best! I hope this helps! Keep up the great work! I wish you the best! Cheers! |
At the beginning, I thought making money online with a blog was super super hard. Not anymore. Learn the art of making money online blogging - step by step - HERE. | |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
long, split |
| |