Offline Case Study: Landscaping Firm or, How I got $50K+ from a company that only does $400K/yr

by 62 replies
89

































































































#main internet marketing discussion forum #$400k or yr #$50k #case #company #firm #landscaping #offline #study
  • Excellent post, Michael. Good on you.
  • Great points. Congratulations!

    (And P.S. - I think it's SO MUCH FUN to learn about other businesses, don't you?? I learn about the craziest things while talking to people - for example, one company we work with builds mattresses to customer's height, weight, thickness preference... and will even do 2 different levels of comfort for couples. Fascinating stuff!)
    • [1] reply
    • Michael,

      This is a great example of what a skilled consultant can do, and what kind of rewards are possible.

      And I agree with you that there's more money to be made advising on the strategic level than on specific tactics.

      I'm not clear, though, on whether or not you are claiming that someone who has little or no experience in marketing can be successful at doing this sort of thing. In my opinion, that's not realistic. What you are describing requires experience and judgment.

      So I'm not sure what guidance this example has to offer for the average newbie on this forum other than something to aspire to in 5-10 years.

      Please let me know if you disagree.

      Respectfully,
      Marcia Yudkin
      • [1] reply
  • Hi Michael

    This is a very valuable post, so thank you for sharing! I would like to ask you, how did you get your foot in the door, so to speak? Did you approach them, did they approach you? How did that happen?

    Did they pay you the moment you opened your mouth, or did you offer them an initial free consulation?

    I'm curious to know the process behind how you got this client in the first place.

    Quite frankly, I'm curious about a lot more, but you'd probably have to turn this into a report
    • [1] reply
    • Michael, if I could have hit the Thanks button twice, I would have.

      In a past life, I was a design engineer and the process you described is very similar to what we did when we targeted an existing product for improvement. I'm finding that applying engineering concepts to sales and marketing yield some very nice (and profitable) insights.

      Things like targeting the end user (you separating residential and commercial accounts), defining the processes and then training to them, even measuring results.

      Excellent case study, here's the second thank you...
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • The intro was a personal networking referral. The one advantage to doing this for so long is the number of success stories and contacts. So as quickly as someone can go from hustling business to working their referral base, the better.

    But there's no magic to it. I just practice my own BS.

    Once we get through the process and reach the tactical levels of activity, it all comes down to the basics of 1) identifying the target listening audience, 2) creating the target message for that audience, and 3) delivering that message via the target medium.

    This holds true for prospects, existing customers, employees, investors, loan officers, etc... Everyone's needs are different, and respond to different messages delivered in different ways.



    The consulting process itself is a documented system that identifies all of this.

    But it would require far more than a report. That wouldn't even scratch the surface.
  • Michael:

    Great points all around. One question I have for you is : What is your "detailed" process that you went through, what angles/scripts did you use to close the deal, and what were there objections (if any) when you popped them the $20,000 fee --- on helping them on the "strategic level" rather than the tactical level?

    Much success,

    Chris Negro
    • [1] reply
    • Hey Chris. First of all, I don't hit them with a $20K price tag up front. The price is structured by phases at an average of around $2500 - $5000 per segment depending on time involved. Each phase cost justifies the next. It's a progression.

      I do a detailed Q&A interview analysis with the prospect at no cost. Just a no-obligation opportunity for me to get to know your business better and kick around some ideas. Generally an hour or two. I have a specific set of questions that I ask about key areas of their business that helps me pre-qualify them before I even decide to go forward with any pitch on my part.

      There's no "script" really. Just key stages of a systematic process. Knowing what to ask and in what order. Someone can lead a prospect down one or many paths of self-discovery, letting the prospect invent things for themself instead of trying to tell them how things are going to go.

      By the end of the first conversation, I know pretty well if the client is a candidate for my strategic-level consulting, and the client pretty much sells themselves into working with me. That's because I have asked them so many questions that led the conversation in so many key directions, they have no question that I know exactly what I am doing and they can already see how the areas we discuss will increase sales once they are fixed.

      Through the entire pre-sales process, I am constantly evaluating if this person is a candidate or not. I don't go into closing mode until I have determined that the specific, key attributes that would guarantee a successful engagement are present. So I know I am assured success if I press for the deal. I don't work with people that don't have the fundamentals down.

      Key fundamentals include, can they afford my services? Can they afford the growth? Can they adapt their business to new ways of doing things? Can they train their people to handle the processes? etc...

      I rarely get objections once I start pressing for the close.

      If I actually ever do get an objection, it's usually because I've missed something in the process.

      One major red flag for me is someone who keeps pressing about cost up front. I explain that I don't really know what it costs because I don't know to what extent their business needs the full scope of work. If they keep pressing, that means they're not psychologically oriented at a level that would understand the concepts or the rationale for the things I recommend.

      I can tell you this... I say "I'll pass" more than I say "I'd like the opportunity to work with you to grow your company."
      • [ 4 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • wow. and then wow.
    because of the difference in money exchange rates, your $20 000 fee would pay for half my house.
    hell if someone offered to pay me that fee i would marry them.
    not sure what i would tell my wife.

    but it just goes to show.
    you are giving us those figures to make a point, not to "tell" us.

    and yet if i told someone local, they would tell me that i am lying.
    their bad!

    thanks for the explain.
    rob
    • [1] reply
    • It's all relative.

      "Mr. Business Owner, If I showed you a systematic way to grow your business that returned you $10 (or more) annually for every dollar invested in just the first year alone, would you be interested?"
      • [1] reply
  • Nice post, but that all sounds like a lot of unnecessary hard work.

    If a person learns Internet marketing as well as you've learned your craft, they could make 50k+ in a month, every single month, with a lot less effort than you're putting forth. And without all the meetings, conference calls, commuting, and all that jazz.

    I know dozens of people who could make 50k in 30 days or less any time they want just by launching a new site or campaign. THAT'S pretty cool if you ask me.

    Different strokes for different folks I guess. Just my opinion ... but this IS an *online* marketing forum.
    • [1] reply
    • It's easy for people to never get past tactics, because that's where they perceive that things "happen". Ask any ad agency rep who has lost a major account out of the blue because they weren't involved in the strategic level of discussion about the direction of their client's operation.



      I don't recall telling how much actual time I spent on this contract in it's actual implementation phase or in the maintenance phase. It's not any more work than say, an information product development cycle and intense product launch with follow up.

      And any pure internet marketer making $50K a month isn't working an hour a day -- at least if they want that $50K a month to last. I know that's what a lot of people like to portray (and believe), but managing all of the outsourced aspects of the business takes real time. Anyone but the most novice among us knows the reality.

      Why? Recidivism. The erosion of a recurring revenue base.

      If an internet marketer goes autopilot, sure the business runs for a while. A lot of people have built businesses that run without them for a while. Months even. But trends shift, traffic patterns change, tactical techniques become ineffective over time. At a 5% per month recidivism rate, what percentage of the original revenue stream still exists in 24 months?

      $50K a month becomes $25K a month pretty quickly without ongoing effort... driving traffic... more backlinks... new JV launches... continual creation of new product...

      I get the impression that you're also assuming that the original consulting work is the only work that I do for a client, and I have no other revenue streams embedded after the fact. My labor is just a portion of the overall revenue from a client.

      Where do you think this client goes when they want direct mail campaigns? Do you think I am actually the one putting envelopes through the Pitney Bowes machine?

      I am not sure that you understand the lifetime value of a single customer in my business vs. an affiliate marketer's customer value. I have clients whose single lifetime value to me is amortized to over $1,000,000. Contrast that with the amount of effort it actually takes to manage the customer base once they are in maintenance phase... I'd rather be generating $5 million a year in revenue from 200 clients than 8300 clients 100% of the time.

      The other factor is that as my clients grow their businesses over time, the size of subsequent projects grow. So even if I did just sit around waiting for them to call me, my revenue actually increases by virtue of the growth implications of a client based on previous work. This is in stark contrast to the diminishing revenue stream of a single project in a purely internet marketing play.

      I also don't have to worry about things like Google slaps, state tax regulations, link cloaking, intellectual property theft, competitive bidding on adwords in my niche, etc... cutting my income unexpectedly.

      I've not even really addressed the concept of competitive barriers to market entry... or why just any guy can't jump into the game and do this.

      But you're right in the sense that it is different strokes for different folks -- and this being an internet marketing forum, we get to see many different ways marketers use the internet to create an income that fits their lifestyle and personal interests. Selling internet marketing services to offline businesses is a big part of this forum. This happens to be the method I use to sell those internet marketing services... and a hell of a lot more.
      • [ 7 ] Thanks
  • This is the stuff jay Abraham taught me. I use it to help other businesses as well.
    I use the extensive questionaire Jay provided me when I became of his protoge program.
    • [1] reply
    • Yeah, I've heard he has a really solid, comprehensive consultant training program. How much did you pay for the protoge program? He has it listed at $4,995 on his site.

      It tooke me 15 years of screwing up to figure it all out.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • I heard Jay Abraham does charge about $5,000 for his ultimate program. Another fellow I admire is Michael Senoff. I think he may be a protoge of Jay Abraham. He has a fantastic lot of audio FREE interviews about making it in the offline business market. Google his name and you will find them. DM me and I'll send you his link. I am not affiliated with either man.

    As to 50K in 30 days online, I say, well, I'm a good man so I won't cuss.

    Michael speaks truth, not BS. I can tell because I've worked the offline market for many years. It takes cajunas to go out there and put yourself on the line in real life, to eff up and keep going back.

    One thing I learned over the years is that genuine sales, I mean the ones that bring you a nice ongoing income from people who trust you, are not 3 hour or 30 day wonders. They are the result of a long line of calls and eventually a friendship. You get the big business, like Michael does, when they trust you.

    By the way, how long does it take to get Google to trust you, my friends. Do you think that happens in one year? On or offline, work your butt off, get off the floor when you've been knocked down and keep on. Eventually you will be making a very nice living.

    Thanks for the great post, Michael.
    • [ 3 ] Thanks
  • Michael, You're so right. Good consulting is about positioning and listening ... and, of course, being a big-picture (aka strategic) thinker and then, being able to actually deliver the results/value.

    To put it another way, the move from tactics to strategies is the move from being paid for what you can DO, to being paid for what you KNOW.

    Great thread and discussion.
    • [2] replies
    • Michael,

      Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU.

      You just reopened my eyes again to the world out there.

      As I am waiting to study business in a local university, I grow less enthusiastic as I start to learn more of the online marketing.

      However, you just reminded me how lucrecious it is out there again rather than concentrating on little bit of income flow online.

      And I totally know you are in control when people come to you for your services instead of vice versa.

      They know you are the real deal when the cost of your services are high...and in return brings them more cash than before.

      As such, the amount paid to you is but a mere small investment to their business.

      Excellent stuff. Something that most people who do not "see the big picture" but only think for their own profits do not understand.

      Cheers
      Jeff
    • Michael, first off let me say that some of what you've discussed is over my head. On the other hand, I know a real story when I hear or see one.

      I appreciate your candid comments and suggestions. So many people want to give you a general outline based on their ideas, but without the "down & dirty" truth ( & experience) about what it will take to succeed.

      Thanks for the story and the forthright suggestions.
      Bob
      • [1] reply
  • Property management companies who can't manage money, and require a seminar on how to save money on "mowing the lawn"?

    In the "real" world most contracts are RFP (unless it's "emergency" maintenance...in which case that step is bypassed) either by the Board of directors (if it is an entity like a Condo/HOA association), or the property manager secures and presents RFP's to the owner), how this company doesn't know this (since they have "commercial" clients), and expect to get property managers to come to seminars (and actually be able to tender a contract to your entity), is beyond me.

    What do I win?
  • Well it's actually a bit more complicated than that.

    Yes, commercial property maint. is primarily done on an annualized contract and/or RFP basis.

    But not all commercial property owners are major property managers like CBRE, CNL, etc... In fact, there are far more medium to small sized property owners. These smaller owners tend to hire the lowest-end contractors... 2 guys and a trailer. That's great, but then when it comes time to do fertilizer application, arbor work, enhancements, snow & ice removal, the owner generally has to find another guy, and another guy. The list of vendors grows, as does the amount of time it takes to juggle each of them. The property owner may be saving money on working with the lowest end contractor, but they lose the savings in the overhead it requires to manage and maintain multiple vendors for all of the various services.

    A part of the USP for my client in the commercial sector is that they are able to offer a full suite of management services, not just your simplification of "mowing the lawn" - yet they are small enough to maintain a personal relationship. Part of this is the sales rep/contract manager is actually the crew supervisor, so they are positioned to know whether the work being done is what was spec'd and bid.

    The seminar for medium-to-small commercial clients involves teaching non-business oriented property manager/owners how to reduce property management costs by consolidating vendors to reduce the internal overhead of managing multiple RFP processes, leverage group co-op purchases of materials, and what to watch out for in a property maintenance/landscape contractor (the tricks that guys use to skin you... like over bidding mulch and failing to apply the amount you bought).

    We've had 2 so far. 20-30 people in attendence with maybe 1/3 closing within 30 days afterwards, the rest still on our list. Average contract $2K/month.

    I'm not sure you won the prize.


    More often than you think.

    And for certain deals, equity participation in the company.

    A former partner of mine, a massive direct mail marketing publisher (largest single owner of Valpak coupon franchises), has traded his services for equity so many times, he now owns a whole bunch of small companies that he helped launch and grow... and eventually just bought out.


    Do you have a packaged process/presentation that you deliver to clients? Did the guy ask you to do these specific things, and you responded with that price?

    I realize that there's a big gap between our respective scopes, but even in the lower-end view, an entry level consultant should be able to easily get $60-$100/hour for this kind of work.

    The landscaping crew guys that work for my client get $480 a week.

    I understand your need to create an income, but as you work for your client, I would be thinking seriously about how to do the next job for a lot more money, and how much value I am creating for the money I am being paid. It's relative. If my work creates income and profit of 10 to 20 times the money invested, I should have no problem getting my price. That's why it's important to be choosing your clients as much as it is them choosing you. If they don't understand the value of what you do, and/or they cannot afford to pay you for the effort, then you're better off not doing the work.

    I predict that you will quickly become disenchanted with this arrangement.
  • Summary of this thread

    As my wise Mentor once said:

    "The Money is not in the 'details' Chris (i.e. tactics/strategies) . The money is in the 'thinking' (i.e. strategic level).

    Awesome Post Michael !

    Much success,

    Chris Negro
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Thanks for this post. You're very advanced in this arena, and how you operate is something to aim for.

    Brian
  • Banned
    You have a lot to learn Young Grasshopper. 1st, let me slap you

    That site is your sig has no onpage SEO. It sucks to say the least. Your post is all over the place. Be direct. Are you saying this guy expects you to work for him directly, possibly from his office? Is so, you are on Crack!

    He is YOUR client, you don't work for him. You are simply offering your Consultaning services and in return you will hopefully make his phone ring.

    The price you can charge is relevant to what the clien can expect in terms of ROI. Can I charge $3,000 a month to a Hot dog stand with one employee and expect the business to stay with me? NO. I can however charge $3k to a lawyer to market his services.

    Everything you say keeps saying YOU are the victim. Your client should have no idea if you have 1M in the bank or one penny. Stop telling me how broke you are, you are already defeated.


    • [1] reply

    • Consultative selling is certainly not new, but in the IM arena, because the focus is so heavy on transactional sale, the concept of marketing vs. sales is really skewed. There's a whole crop of "gurus" out there that are selling "sales" techniques, not "marketing" in the textbook sense.

      When an entrepreneur has BOTH (sales techniques & strategic marketing) down cold, the kind of money that can be created is obscene.

      Definately having a network in place makes life a lot easier. Just working the network will create new clients.

      Glad to be of inspiration. Please let me know if I can assist.

      The problem is that you're caught between desperately needing a paycheck, and doing what you really want as a career. It sounds like you've tried to accomplish both out of this guy, and you need to consider the overall perspective.

      If you're content to work with him for a time to get your cash situation stabilized, I would be very specific about what you're doing, for how much. Otherwise, he's bought himself a general laborer on the cheap.

      If you can take some aspect of what you're doing for him, and create a success story, then that can build your portfolio towards landing your next deal.

      But get it in your head right now where you stand. Job/Paycheck vs. Project/Client
      • [1] reply
  • Hi All and Michael,

    First off Michael I agree with everything you say, I would be a fool not to because you obviously know a lot and know what you are talking about. You certainly give us something to shoot for if that is what we are want.

    In my town, LA, CA, we have guys who stand on the corner and sell oranges, we have produce markets, markets that sell produce as one out of many items, we have the famous farmers market and we have the central produce market.

    If I were to compare myself to one of those I'd probably be the guy on the corner selling oranges.

    I can't find the exact quote but you said something to the effect that you were the one who would get my business if I didn't shape up. (my words)

    Actually you won't take my business, ever. LOL Not because you couldn't, you could take it with both hands tied behind your back, however, you would not want my business, that is my clients. I on the other hand like my clients and the way I serve them and my customers like what I do for them. Even if sometimes all I do for them is put up a ugly brochure site so they can tell Uncle Bob, "Wanna see my site."

    On the rare occasion where someone of your caliber would take one of my customers that would actually be a compliment to me. It would mean I took a client from where you would not touch them and brought them up to your caliber. Sort of like the Boxer's or Entertainer's manager who finds them when they were nobodies and gets dumped by them when stardom hits. They ride off into the sunset with the famous manager who can take them to higher levels and the old manager waves goodbye with a smile on his face and a tear in his eye.

    I only post this to encourage others like me who don't have the time, patients or where-with-all to reach your level but still need to keep on keepin on.

    Picking up the crumbs and loving it,

    George Wright
    • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Thanks for this post Michael.

    I was in business-to-business sales for 15 years before getting into IM and this has given me the inspiration to approach a couple businesses who could do with just this kind of consultancy.

    In that time I got to know alot of business owners pretty well so the advantage for me will be that I won't have any problems with introductions and it will be easy to arrange to sit down with them for the initial discussions.

    Thanks again Michael. Good luck with your future projects.

    Steve.
  • Nice thread ....lots of information here. Maria and her team have a very logical and professional approach to this consulting and for the price , it is a steal. I am not selling anyone on this, just mention it in passing.
    thanks guys
  • Michael,

    Thanks for starting such an interesting thread, it has been a pleasure to read it from start to finish. The information is excellent and you have taken some time out of your day to come back and answer the questions that everyone has had. Fantastic Post!

    Thanks again,

    Joel
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • Great post, Michael! As a native of Anderson Township, I find it interesting and inspirational that small area businesses are willing to pay so much for your great work. Just don't put Hyde Park Landscaping out of business, I have some friends that work for that company haha!
  • I haven't read this entire thread, but I will, and the OP was great!

    As for simple services you can do - Which is REALLY SIMPLE and effective, you can start by tracking their offline advertising methods.
    If you know how to build a webpage, you can easily do this yourself.

    For example and ad in a magazine can be "Get your exclusive special report today! At "Ourwebsite.com/magazine-name"

    And from there, track every single offline advertising campaign they do.
    You don't even need to make more than one report. Or you can do variations, for example if a direct sale is what you want.

    Now you are able to track the ROI of every single offline advertising campaign they do, and it's ridiculously easy too! (Plus, you can still charge a lot, even if it's easy. They will be impressed and more profitable than before pretty quickly)

    That was just an example of the many very simple and extremely effective things you can do for business owners
  • Awesome post Mike! I recently opened up a consulting program so anything related is a must read for me. That's cool you're in the Cincinnati area man, I live on the outskirts :-)
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • What CRM solution do you recommend?
    • [1] reply

    • What size of business? What level of IT sophistication? What tactical-level marketing uses of the data do they intend to pursue?

      (you just got "consultified"... I didn't answer the question directly. I need far more information)

      In some instances, an Excel spreadsheet will be just fine. Salesforce.com is good for other situations. ACT and Saleslogix have a place, as does Microsoft CRM.

      I'm really big on open, non-proprietary data formats, which allows the business to easily dump their data into other applications.

      It's not a single bullet for everyone solution.
      • [1] reply
  • HI Micheal,

    Nice post. I just say it is a traditional approach to drive the businessess by offering consulting services. The only change is to grab the right tool on time. As the INTERNET is the most powerful tool in this arena for any aspect of life. It has increased the power of an ordinary man.
    The way you are consulting is a common sense, which is called process approach to improvement.

    Thanks again for such a nice post.

    Thanks.
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [1] reply
    • This is such a good thread I figured what
      the heck I'll put this up.

      This is what I used to do and what I charged.
      You can see it's also an outline of what you should do.




























      • [ 2 ] Thanks
  • Now that's just freaky - I grew up in Anderson Township as well. Michael or Jake, can either of you send some Skyline/Gold Star chili, Larosa's Pizza or Graeters Ice Cream down to Houston? I'm going through withdrawal.

    Thanks for the great case study - I look forward to seeing what you roll out Michael!

    Dennis
  • The local mastermind meetings were sort of tabled as everyone got busy with their respective calendars towards the end of summer. I am hoping to get another date scheduled for fall.

    Glad you were able to see the approach here. Rather than pushing the internet for the sake of the internet as a tactical measure, taking a very strategic view broadens the picture (and the opportunity).


    Hi Blase, great stuff. You can certainly validate the power of going to the strategic level with an overall marketing view for an "offline" client vs. barging through the door with your SEO services like a used car salesman (which seems to be a popular method of marketing for SEO... which is why I pick on it).

    This appears to be a similar approach as the HMA - Hidden Marketing Assets system that Mike Senoff & Sensei Richard promotes. It seems to be a pretty solid program, albeit a bit pricey. I think it's even more expensive than the Jay Abraham protege' course ($5800 +/- ??).

    The HMA approach is certainly effective, particularly for smaller businesses that aren't very sophisticated beyond the "technician" entrepreneur level... a la Gerber's "e-Myth". Without question, it gets to the core of the low-hanging marketing fruit (so to speak) within the business. However, I find that it still focuses more on the tactical level of "things we do on the battlefield" vs. the campaign we create before we send in the troops and the systems we put into place to report back to us how effective our strategy is working over the long haul.

    However, one size does NOT fit all from business sector to sector, geographic market to market, and environment to environment. It's still a sort of "one-trick pony" approach - although an effective one with a lot of market potential.

    Keep in mind here, I am absolutely not being critical of the HMA. It's a great system and very successful in helping small businesses round out their marketing approach.

    Far too often, marketing people treat marketing like it exists in this magical, utopian fairyland vacuum, somehow or another separate from the rest of the business. It's like Uncle Daddy inbreeding. The more inbred it gets, the weaker the DNA.

    But marketing goes so much deeper into the intrinsics of a successful business operation. I try to use an abstracted model that gets applied to each area based on a very simple formula. The core formula can then be applied to any tactical marketing area.

    I dig even deeper by implementing marketing strategies within a CPI (continuous process improvement) model roughly approximated on proven TQM philosophies like those taught by Deming, Six Sigma, Lean (Toyota Production Systems), Balanced Scorecard, etc...

    I am not sure why marketing was passed over in the wild scramble to implement ISO and TQM models in manufacturing and services industries during the 80's and 90's, but the statistical foundation lends itself very well to continuous improvement.

    The reason that I use a TQM approach is the firsthand experience of software product architecture and R&D -- which has to not only exist somewhere in the middle of the classic struggle between the technical engineering camp and marketing camp, but actually deliver results for future success of said company. In order to ensure the future success of a business, the entity must continue to develop and release products and services that are matched to its target market. For those of you who are Geoffrey Moore (Crossing The Chasm) fans, this might sound a little familiar.

    The Strategic-level/TQM approach bridges the gap between ALL of the stakeholders... customers, sales, operations, finance, senior management, etc... Marketing should be constantly feeding the owners/managers and/or decisionmakers with a stream of information - not only concerning sales numbers, but through each and every step of the business operation... customer service, product & inventory management, and even finance.

    Each of these areas have a push-pull relationship between their own domain and marketing. Each and every one of these areas are ultimately affected by, and in return also affect the production and/or delivery of a product or service to a customer (which is the function of a business, correct? deliver a product or service to a customer in a value exchange?)

    Taking the integration side of the HMA system as a comparison, it's one thing to make sure your employees can recite the USP verbatim on demand. It's another thing for them to understand how their job and their execution of the job affects the overall marketing process. Further, it's even more complex to be able to identify trends and adapt a product or service mix based on the feedback and analysis of marketing data, and reallocate financial resources within the operation based on the numbers produced by such a system.

    How can a business structure its marketing so it can adapt to market conditions QUICKLY from the top to the bottom of the operation?

    Okay, I'll shut up now. I know I am probably making a bunch of IM-only people's heads spin around like The Exorcist.

    You Turpin guys... I'll tell you... they're everywhere... Not as bad as St. X. or Moeller guys though.... those guys are like breeding rats...
    • [ 1 ] Thanks
    • [2] replies
    • This is interesting, you mentioned Sensei Richard, would that be a guy
      by the name of Richard Johnson from Utah?

      If it is, he is the guy that really helped me put it together. But
      I worked with him back in the 90's.

      We were both Jay Abraham proteges, but if you know Jay's material
      he bounces around like a bebe in a basketball.

      Richard Johnson, got permission from Jay to put it all together in a course.
      I still have it, it's 16 manuals and 16 VHS tapes. great stuff.

      I know what you are saying in the rest of your post, and yes there is
      a lot more you could do. I was a sales and marketing manager for a fortune 1000 company.

      But what I found with most small businesses is that if
      I could just get them on a path of doing the basics they were good to go.

      It was also a lot less work for decent money.

      Blase
    • This is some strong advice. Those who understand what he is talking about, know this is like adding rocketfuel to your IM to offline business bag of tricks. The skill sets inherent in the Kaizen philosophies is so powerful for an offline business owner. Good stuff man.
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
      • [1] reply
  • Actually, I was an Anderson HS guy...but I agree about those St X and Moeller guys.

    Dennis
    • [1] reply
    • Michael,
      by far one of the top 3 thread post's i have seen in regards to the offline
      model here at WF. If folks would just walk in with a USP, and follow your
      guide lines, they would have more work than they know what to do with.

      I thought i had most of the angles covered for offline, however your post
      opened up a couple of more arenas that really got my attention.

      Thanks for taking the time to write such a lenghty post, and a very
      very informative thread.

      Regards,
      Robert Nelson
      • [ 1 ] Thanks
  • Banned
    [DELETED]

Next Topics on Trending Feed