3 replies
  • OFF TOPIC
  • |
Any claims of automatically generated original content that would pass human inspection are bogus.
  • Profile picture of the author glchandler
    Any claims of automatically generated original content that would pass human inspection are bogus.
    Oh crap!

    I guess I should wait until somebody asks what the purpose of this thread it.....
    Then I will say it surely is not to increase post count.....

    Then I will have to plead an out-of-balance humor meter...

    Then I will have to say it's time to go to work.....

    Why waste the time....I'm going straight to TAKE A NAP!!!!!! Work is too time consuming.
    Signature

    There is never a BAD time to help those living with lousy kidneys!
    http://funds.gofundme.com/1oh40


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3411958].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Roaddog
    Originally Posted by thunderbird View Post

    Any claims of automatically generated original content that would pass human inspection are bogus.

    Is there a software that claims it can create original content?

    Before you consider me completely slow, it's not the kind of software I ever look for..




    Jim
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3412223].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author thunderbird
      Originally Posted by Roaddog View Post

      Is there a software that claims it can create original content?

      Before you consider me completely slow, it's not the kind of software I ever look for..

      Jim
      I won't elaborate on this, suffice to say I've taken some for test drives and the generated syntax wasn't readable. I might even be wrong, though, in my generalization. Some interesting stuff does come out of MIT. The algorithm would need to include basic article structure -- introductory statement, facts that elaborate on it, pro or con, then a summary.
      Signature

      Project HERE.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3412427].message }}

Trending Topics