Calfornia Woman Accused Of Cutting Off Her Estranged Husband's Penis:

Kurt, that was just lovely. Could you post this in the comments section of the Huffington Post article? I'm sure others would enjoy it.

That was my first thought

I could never ever ever ever even think about such a disgusting hearthless act!!!

Kurt, to be honest...I thought your poem was actually quite clever and creative.

As to being able to "find a little humor in just about anything", I challenge you to lighten up and find humor in those of us who DON'T find humor in this situation.



I mean that in the nicest way possible, especially in light of your recent post in reference to the c-r-a-p that goes on in this world. Maybe you could find humor in one of judgmental types falling off our soap boxes and slipping a disc in our backs?

LOL

I don't know.

I'm only suggesting you take the same "finding humor" approach towards us as well.

All the best,
Michael

Just don't let her hear you say "old".

Steve

Well, the difference is that a finger would be a finger. If she cut off one of his fingers, I would figure cutting off one of hers would be equivalent. And a finger can be replaced far easier, etc... Many women feel the same way about those parts they have, that men don't. Of course most are not so easily damaged, and it is pretty rare, at least in europe and the US, that a husband would try to do so. HECK, in parts of africa, they start to, with girls, APPROACH an equivalent of what that idiot "wife" did, and women all over the planet SCREAM about it! Not that I blame them at all. It is STUPID, and TORTURE at best. I don't even like what they did to baby boys in the US, and still do to some, that just approaches THAT. All that USUALLY only approaches the mayhem here though.

I think gassing would be too good for someone doing this. Put her in a REAL prison, and just FORGET about her. HEY, maybe she can be the first in the real prison. I could hear it now. Hey, NO conjugle visits? NO desserts? NO cable? NO books? Hard work? Etc.... UNCONSTITUTIONAL! REALLY? Please state chapter and verse! It would STILL be too good.

Steve

I ain't gonna touch that with my ten-foot pole.

Well, at least it would be quick. It's harder than this though.

Steve

Whoa.. You almost had me there.

Him?

Well, she did more than just "cut him off". She went out of her way to amplify every little action. EACH is deserving of jail time. That last one is just deserving of a life sentence. I doubt she will REALLY get it, but she deserves it. AND, if she gets out, gets remarried, and someone does what I described would be the equivalent, to her, and I hear about it, I may be the FIRST to come to the other persons defense saying that she merely got what she deserved.

I normally wouldn't condone that, but in HER case, I would make an exception. It may SEEM out of line, but if a person could only keep their books, business, health records, transportation information, on ONE little gadget that had NO ability to be backed up or replaced, and a person intentionally damaged it, it would be equivalent to all that for another person. If he then burned a persons home, destroying ALL their records, and blew up their car, there would be NO difference! After all, they are just denying that second person what THEY were denied. Given the same circumstances, the second party would have lost their home and transportation ANYWAY! It only SEEMS harsher. Maybe that gadget they bought cost $10, and the home cost a billion. Who cares? The final value of the $10 could have been MORE! THAT is why the US spent ALL that time looking for those laptops. THAT is why companies have spent BILLIONS on similar things. Sometimes the whole IS worth far more than the sum of its parts.

Steve

YEAH! I heard a woman on a talk show today, and she said SHE considered it! Though she claimed she was REALLY mistreated, she ADMITTED that she had options. LUCKILY SHE simply left her husband. The reason that she gave, for not hurting her husband, was that it wasn't worth destroying HER life over.

As for the victim of THIS incident? It sounds like he got a bad doctor. The doctor said that the most important thing was to "stop the bleeding"! WRONG!!!!!!! The bleeding WAS somewhat controlled to get him there. The most important thing was to try to reconstruct it, if that were EVEN possible! They apparently cauterized things, etc... so he has little hope of being normal. It probably ISN'T possible though. 8-( They said that he will be able to "urinate normally". YEAH RIGHT! Probably not normal for a male. They probably mean normal in that he would be able to control it, and not need a catheter, etc...

Anyway, that is little consolation. I wonder if women that do this sort of thing even think about the full impact it has. And an infection could set in and it could contaminate every part of the man's life, as if losing the member and all weren't enough. Bobbit's statement was that he got more enjoyment than she did! What a FEEBLE reason! Maybe if she told him about that, he would have found a way to make her life and all better.

Seriously women, a lot of men would LOVE to keep you happy. If you don't let guys know that they are doing something wrong, they may not even think that you have any concerns.

Steve

Some people take the term "you're cut off" to extremes.

A talk show host here said that EVERY male probably grabbed hiss crotch when the lorenna bobbit case was talked about. I don't know of ANY way to convey the feeling to a woman. Hopefully you and your husband are understandably loving of one another and see the other person as one that will come to your defense and risk THEIR life for you, as opposed to a potential enemy.

Since the beginning of time, EVERY creature has realized that the most vulnerable time in its life is when it is asleep. That is one reason why many kids are afraid of the dark. They know that their main protectors are asleep, they can't see well, so their imagination runs wild and they see form in shadows. So THEY tend to not sleep.

Some creatures, like praying mantises, may KNOW the female will make a snack of the male, but Mammals, like we are, are supposed to PROTECT one another. Many males have died, or gotten SEVERELY injured, SIMPLY because they perceived their mate to be threatened.

So your husband wants to know that if you perceive a threat, you will AT LEAST wake him up. The LAST thing he wants to think about is YOU trying to do him harm. Cases like lorenna Bobbit get men thinking about something they never dared to consider. And that is bad.

Totally castrating a man causes problems with going to the restroom, having sex, being perceived as male, fertility, and testosterone that deals with almost everything else. It really IS a LOT to lose. Some women have been brainwashed into thinking it is just vanity and ego, and really has few tangible values.

Steve

At least THEY probably didn't do the FULL thing. I mean cutting off JUST the testicles DOES affect testosterone, and fertility, but most of the subsequent problems can be prevented by testosterone replacement. They EVEN have types of testosterone that could probably prevent most of the other problems WITHOUT adding the lust they try to prevent.

Anyway, I am not aware of ANY major religion that in any way comes CLOSE to suggesting, or even approving, castration.

GRANTED, some cults may do that. But THEY tend to be crazy ANYWAY!

Steve