Stop wasting your money on bad links

13 replies
  • SEO
  • |
Ever since google released Penguin in 2012, some of the SEO consultants as well as site owners continued posting links to questionable sites, saying that it is good for promotion in a specific region or through low frequency requests, but the thing is that I still do not use business keys in anchor for these sites, not everyone is penalized. The main problem is not a lack of knowledge but rather outdated information.



What do I meant by "low quality sites"? These are spam blogs, networks of satellites and articles websites. Why do I put them in the same bucket? Article resources are better and whiter than spam blog. Before we jump to any conclusion let's look at their common features. (Do you know how these things came to being?) Spam blogs are websites created for promotion of other sites.

Spam blog require little time to build, since there are free blogging platform and tools for generation or aggregation of contents. Many major seo-company and brand stores have long used this tool to increase the link mass, these are the site such as blogger.com.

But in fact, such links make no positive impact, not in seo, not in traffic or conversions. Those who make money placing links to spam blogs, will soon make money removing them. You can always use a waiver of links through Google Webmaster.

Networks of satellites are almost the same spam blog, but they work differently. This can be fake online shopping sites or services, information resources, directories and others. Network owners are guided by the same principle - once the links are working, it is necessary to create a variety of agents, which for us will tell about them.

Just for $10 you can find a script that creates a unique online store for a given subject, products, pictures, images to Google in a second. It can even pick up video reviews on YouTube. However, a good network is expensive, and only the large companies can afford it.

The "confession of the black SEO" describes how through ownership of a network of satellites in a pre "Penguin" era people lured major clients.


Article directories and site articles are in fact the same blog entry, just a little bit more text with a little differently decorated home page design. Articles Sites appear to be much better than blogs in terms of links, however, that is illusion, they work the same way.

And most article networks were created specifically for money making through the links, and not through a conversion but through their impact on SEO. You may be presented with a silver plate with the inscription of the "Article marketing", but marketing starts where there is a target audience but in most cases the web sites on which company or webmaster will get you to post links, do not have much of the target traffic, if any at all.


How do you determine which sites are useful for articles, which are not? In the first place this kind of sites contain useless content and the site in general is useless. There is no traffic, practically nobody reads them, except for someone who get there accidentally. In such sites almost all traffic comes from organic links and it is usually very small.

Behavioral factors are bad as well. Many failures, small internal transfer or comments. The visitor will be better off going to advertised sites than to stay on the site.

No one wants to get links to these sites (unless the sites are from their network). There are more sites that link to these sites than the other way around.

Links to spam blog sites lead to completely different topics, from children's toys and English courses to lease real estate and buying gadgets. Some webmasters find solutions by creating themed spam blog and link exclusively on the topic, but that doesn't help much. Commercial anchor links to these sites are mainly on the business sites and often have a commercial anchor.

Big mistake of the search engines is that they continue to index these sites. And these resources will exist for a long time, until sale of links and context pays for the domain. Traffic allows them to monetize and somehow exist.

Webmasters and SEOs may also participate in cleaning the Internet from marginally useful entities. A good place to start is to stop buying the links, express your thoughts to friends and colleagues regarding the links, publish in blogs examples of links have lead or may lead to a decrease in the company's reputation or its traffic from search, publish examples of how to obtain links naturally or in creative ways, not to cooperate with companies that offer to buy links or articles. It's time to gather stones, thoughtlessly scattered in the past.

The users of Fiverr are especially nasty in that, when ordering the links there you need to check them carefully, do not take a larger package from new users, especially if they have bought them on any link exchange or have placed them through software.

Lasty, I would like to share the minimum conditions when placing links:
  1. The theme of the page or site should be related to keywords
  2. Over 30K unique visitors per month
  3. Spam of the outgoing links is not more than 0.3.
  4. Manual inspection of the purposes and work of the site. That is, the sale of the links isn't main source of income.
  5. Use of the parameters of moz.com

And methods to distribute the links
  1. Reivew and analyze the backlinks of competitors using ahrefs.com, let webmasters know when placing links.
  2. Review the top search results by keywords and communicate with webmasters.
  3. Links to websites web 2.0 (forums, comments, resources and Q&As)
  4. Registration in the trust directory (no software)
  5. Register on different accounts, and leave a link to yourself
  6. In thematic groups in social networks.


It'll be interesting to hear your opinion on the quality of the links.
#bad #google #links #money #penguin #seo #stop #wasting
  • Profile picture of the author Garybear
    Bad backlinks don't help website to increase traffic or rank. So much more better to avoid bad pages. Because quality is a must for ranking and traffic issue.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10777940].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yukon
    Banned
    Stop wasting your money on bad links
    Is it ok to waste money on bad forum articles?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10778032].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author vovanfree
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Is it ok to waste money on bad forum articles?
      Dear sir, I would greatly appreciate if you can provide links to articles that better cover this topic - I always welcome positive user experience of the visitors to this forum.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10778099].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by vovanfree View Post

        Dear sir, I would greatly appreciate if you can provide links to articles that better cover this topic - I always welcome positive user experience of the visitors to this forum.


        Seriously, a better article than this?

        Lasty, I would like to share the minimum conditions when placing links:
        1. The theme of the page or site should be related to keywords
        2. Over 30K unique visitors per month
        3. Spam of the outgoing links is not more than 0.3.
        4. Manual inspection of the purposes and work of the site. That is, the sale of the links isn’t main source of income.
        5. Use of the parameters of moz.com


        You're just posting off the wall nonsense.

        30K visitors per month for a good backlink? Are you mad?

        Spam at 0.3? WTF does that even mean?

        Moz parameters? Sure If you're a noob with a credit card.

        GTFO.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10778114].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author vovanfree
          30K is the number of unique visitors to the blog/site there you post your links, not number of unique traffic generated by the link.

          Spam at 0.3 is the ratio of all spam links to good/relevant links. If the ratio is higher than 0.3, that means that this website/forum is not trustworthy.

          If you want your link to be worth anything, you need to check if the website/blog meets minimum moz parameters.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10779565].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author DABK
            You're missing the point.

            In addition, I have a site that gets piss poor spam rank from moz because I have too little schema tags in relation to total content.

            Furthermore, why 30k? Have you done testing and found out that 28k doesn't work, or 7k or 200?

            Because, I've got a half a dozen links from sites that get 10-100 visitors a month and they got me a nice bump. And I got dozens of links from sites with much higher traffic, and they got me the same nice bump for another site. So, based on my experience and thinking box, 30k is horse manure.

            Originally Posted by vovanfree View Post

            30K is the number of unique visitors to the blog/site there you post your links, not number of unique traffic generated by the link.

            Spam at 0.3 is the ratio of all spam links to good/relevant links. If the ratio is higher than 0.3, that means that this website/forum is not trustworthy.

            If you want your link to be worth anything, you need to check if the website/blog meets minimum moz parameters.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10779642].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cbpayne
      Originally Posted by yukon View Post

      Is it ok to waste money on bad forum articles?
      You should ask for a refund.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10780076].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author adityapradhan
    Nice article. Each SEO agency should follow the practice to generate good links for their clients. Still there are many agencies which are following bad practices to generate links faster resulting negative impact on clients websites.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10778041].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author hoozonyourteam
    nice post you have share and very informative about bad links actually problem is that in the past bad SEOers went around begging, buying and swapping links to poor quality content from places that aren’t necessarily relevant in an attempt to satisfy clients who had poor metrics for a job well done. An SEO person should not be getting paid by the link, they should be getting paid for getting better conversions from quality visits from related search terms. Google has always been aimed at providing good quality results to users. SEOers have always aimed to making their site be the top of the rankings.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10779972].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Matthew Iannotti
    Hahahaha in other words, this isn't 2009 anymore. The good old days when ranking was so damn easy if you just blasted links out with SENuke or Xrumer.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10779984].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Thinkfast
      Originally Posted by Matthew Iannotti View Post

      Hahahaha in other words, this isn't 2009 anymore. The good old days when ranking was so damn easy if you just blasted links out with SENuke or Xrumer.
      Agree but that was not quite good because result past good days is get penalized by Google in present days. So SEO Link Building now a days is not like simple game of child. If you will play simply then Google will slap you for sure.
      Signature
      Reduce SEO Cost by Buy Credits Packages - Save Upto 50% SEO Budget.
      Guest Posting Sites List - 10k+ Sites Collection, No PBN , Multiple Niche Markets .
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10780389].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author vovanfree
    When I choose websites for my link building, I choose those with 1,000+ unique visitors a day, because the websites built to sell the links or the websites with useless content can’t get past 1,000 visitors. That’s why 30K/month is my threshold (a rule of thumb, if you will).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10781836].message }}

Trending Topics