ANyone having much luck with Angela's Dec packet?

a This will be my only post on this thread.

First of all, the backlinks sometimes take months to show up in backlink checkers. By then, if the sites weren't in a packet, there is probably a reason for this. Not all of my backlinks have been or will be in packets; I do a TON of "testing" while finding links. Many sites are rejected for packets.

Second, part of the service I do is to show people HOW to get links on the sites; some sites are very easy and other sites take a bit of time to figure out. Back before I started doing step-by-step instructions, a good percentage of the folks who got my guide couldn't figure them out at all just from the written directions.

People often say that 50%, 80% etc of the sites in the packet don't work. However this is almost ALWAYS an exaggeration. 50% would be a full 15 sites that don't work and 80% would be a full 24 sites that don't work. Considering the fact that most people have been able to do just fine with this packet, I seriously doubt that all but 6 sites have closed off registrations. My own outsourcer says that sometimes it takes more than one try for a site; it's often just a glitch.

I really don't see the difference of 50% of 30 or 50% of 3 million that someone found themselves. 50% is 50% and if that's the reason you don't want to use my packets, how is 50% of your sites not working any better than 50% of MY sites working (if that were the case, which it's not)? Besides, Google may show you 3 million sites in your search query, but you will NOT be able to access all 3 million sites from Google's index. So you actually have quite a few FEWER than 3 million sites that are usable to you; besides, how is wading through hundreds and hundreds of low or no Page Rank sites in a search query of a particular platform a more beneficial use of your time than simply using the sites in the packet that are available? At least with those, you guarantee a PR 6 and above for the sites you get. Even "reverse engineering" someone's site is a time consuming process without guaranteed results, as we are not able to get links on ALL the sites someone else's site got links on; not all the sites are open to the "public". Spend a bit of time doing both of these activities for a while and see if you don't realize that paying someone a few dollars a month for sites that someone has already done all this work to find is a bit better use of your time. Most marketers don't have unlimited hours to spend wading through search queries of millions of largely low or 0 Page Rank sites or testing thousands of backlinks that other sites have, to see which ones are High enough Page Rank and are available to everyone. My product is actually a service I do for marketers which saves them countless hours, as opposed to being simply a "packet of links".


Not all site owners hate traffic; even if people are putting links in the very spots the sites have designed for the links. So the fact that a lot of people are going to the sites is in no way going to close down all the sites. Think about it; would YOU shut off the capability for a bunch of traffic to YOUR site, if people were using it the way you've set it up to be used?? Why would you do something like this? A BUNCH of the sites have a spot for people to set up their anchor text links; that's the way the software is designed. So I don't really see the issue with the site getting a bunch of traffic from folks using the site the way it's designed. Plenty of subscribers have found sites in the packets that they intend to continue to participate on, so the argument that all marketers are ignoring everything on a site but their link does not hold water.


My links don't all come from the same platform. Over the months, the links have come from many different types of sites and many different platforms. There's no way that people would lose ALL their links, even if one of the platforms went "no follow", and there's no way to find out how to get ALL of these types of links simply by looking at my packets.


The last point is that anyone who's been around a while before people like me and Paul made backlinking easy remembers that in order to get a good backlink, you either had to "rent" one for BIG BUCKS on someone's site, or you had to comment on a bunch of low PR blogs or forums. For $5 a month, it's still a great deal even if some of the sites don't work.