It's been dawning on me lately that you only need a handful of high page PR backlinks to shoot your PageRank way up. Just a few days ago, a Warrior stumbled upon an example of this: richardsonmurphy.com . au
A few killer backlinks VS. thousands of so-so ones?
6
It's been dawning on me lately that you only need a handful of high page PR backlinks to shoot your PageRank way up. Just a few days ago, a Warrior stumbled upon an example of this:
richardsonmurphy.com . au
The page has a measly 3 backlinks to it, including one from WarriorForum.
PageRank of 3.
dburk figured out that it was because another high PR site had linked to it on its homepage, which singlehandedly shot its PageRank way up.
So here's my question:
As internet marketers competing for that #1 spot in medium-to-highly competitive niches, does it really make sense for us to invest all this time and money doing our usual dofollow blog commenting, profile linking, web 2.0 property creating, etc etc, when all we need to do is invest our time (or money) in just a few killer backlinks?
It's about opportunity cost, isn't it?
What's your take on this?
richardsonmurphy.com . au
The page has a measly 3 backlinks to it, including one from WarriorForum.
PageRank of 3.
dburk figured out that it was because another high PR site had linked to it on its homepage, which singlehandedly shot its PageRank way up.
So here's my question:
As internet marketers competing for that #1 spot in medium-to-highly competitive niches, does it really make sense for us to invest all this time and money doing our usual dofollow blog commenting, profile linking, web 2.0 property creating, etc etc, when all we need to do is invest our time (or money) in just a few killer backlinks?
It's about opportunity cost, isn't it?
What's your take on this?
- crushthenet
- kingofseo Banned
- AFI
- [1] reply
- Mike Anthony
- [1] reply
- dadamson
Next Topics on Trending Feed
-
6