8 replies
  • SEO
  • |
You know sometimes, it's difficult for us to to get our KW density high enuf in an article to our desired level due to the long tail keywords or somehow the keyword is difficult to be inserted too often in an article. What tips are there for us to be able to increase the density level apart from putting them in the article itself? I see some people using hidden text which I believe is not allow. Any experience IM can share? Thks...
#density #keyword
  • Profile picture of the author FredJones
    If you are talking about longer tailed keywords then they would naturally appear lesser number of times in the body. That's the whole purpose of them being long tailed.

    I don't know about others, but I would simply go natural about it, have it appear only a few number of times (could be once in around 100 words for "shorter" long tails and once in 200 words in "longer" long tails, as a random example) and do my off page stuff. Plus, I would want such pages to rank for multiple long tails - I would target multiple related long tails, and put each long tail at the above frequency.

    For mainstream keywords, the keyword should appear much more frequently.

    The concepts of Term Frequency and Inverted Document Frequency are the first step building blocks for any search engine (and they would use these concepts in their own way) since hypertext based information mining is founded on those concepts. So I believe the above looks natural enough while remaining within the radars.

    Originally Posted by freeabs View Post

    You know sometimes, it's difficult for us to to get our KW density high enuf in an article to our desired level due to the long tail keywords or somehow the keyword is difficult to be inserted too often in an article. What tips are there for us to be able to increase the density level apart from putting them in the article itself? I see some people using hidden text which I believe is not allow. Any experience IM can share? Thks...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4868838].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author n_touch
    The theory that I always use is to write for the reader and not the search engines. I do not follow a density that every article must have. You want to make sure that you are getting your keywords in the article, but at the same time do not want to sound spammy.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4869028].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author UMS
    General rule of thumb that I use is if you feel that you need to force your keywords into your article, then you are overdoing it (particularly for long tail keywords)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4869943].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cineva
    Is that true that you have many keywords, this will be easier for your website to be in top?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4870127].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CazareCostinesti
      If think is better if you have 2 or maximum 3 keywords in order to get best visibility in google search
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5266794].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author samual james
    Hi, you can create sub points and insert your keywords over there, 2-3% keyword density is good for articles.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4870213].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ArticlePrincess
    Anyone know of a good keyword denisty tool? I always just calculate it in my head.
    Thanks!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4870235].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author C Rebecca
    See, there is no hard and fast rule of keyword density. Though, a few search engines are very strict about it.

    What I believe is keyword occurrence should be organic. If your content demands more keyword placement, insert them.

    There is a thin line between inserting and stuffing. Unnecessary placement is stuffing and it is black hat and may lead to penalty.
    Signature

    FREE 30 minutes of Ecommerce Marketing consultation. Consulted clients like Overstock.com, About.com, Lowe's and more...
    Book at: hello@techzui.com

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4870629].message }}

Trending Topics