WEB 2.0 properties linking to all of my sites ?

12 replies
  • SEO
  • |
What is your stand about that ?

Instead of creating 20 web 2.0 for say for each site, creating 20 general ones, in which each article posted is linking to one of your sites.

The meaning is to build only 20, expand them with content, and linking each one of them to multiple sites.

Any thoughts? never tried it out.
#linking #properties #sites #web
  • Profile picture of the author dp40oz
    Basically your talking about building a web 2.0 network which is a great idea and works really well. Just keep in mind that you don't own the property. You are always gonna be at risk that your web 2.0's may get deleted. Thats why my web 2.0 network is a bit over 5000 properties at this point
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6663445].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ownergolan
      Originally Posted by dp40oz View Post

      Basically your talking about building a web 2.0 network which is a great idea and works really well. Just keep in mind that you don't own the property. You are always gonna be at risk that your web 2.0's may get deleted. Thats why my web 2.0 network is a bit over 5000 properties at this point
      Thats good to know, but comparing that to building 20 properties each time for each site ? which is to thought of better ?

      thnx for your input mate
      Signature
      "Aiyyo I'm gonna be on ti-dop, that's all my eyes can see..
      Ill put in work, and watch my status escalate"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6663758].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Personally I would add some of my own domains. Hosting can be very cheap and gives you necessary diversity and something you own and control along with the web 2.0s
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6663785].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author addlinkweb
    yeah its good idea. But that 20 web 2.0 sites should be niche relevant to your money sites. if some of your money websites are not niche relevant to your web 2.0 then you will observe a negative effect from Google
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6665161].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HD Node
    I agree that a network of web 2.0 sites can be useful, although be careful not to leave any footprints.

    With certain web 2.0 properties, creating one article and then abandoning the account is a recipe to get your work removed, as it can appear very spammy. But using the account for more than one article has the added benefit of making it look more genuine, thus increasing the chances that your backlink will stick.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6665970].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author advancedmile
    It is far better to make new properties for any new site, but post more than 1 article on each property. It has to be niche relevant.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6665996].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sikaka4
    Personally I do it put i do just 15 PR 5-8 Web 2.0 Profile Backlinks because it give the highest possible quality of backlinks. plus will improve positions in search engines.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6679241].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6679275].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ZmB
      Originally Posted by infolicious View Post

      How bout copy articles?
      I purchased 25 of them from someone on here using the same unique article (not listed on my own website) pointing to my money site.

      Still waiting for effects. I used several different anchors, high pr article sites, etc.

      Will post within 1 week..
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6679336].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author webalfie
    Creating 20 web 2.0 properties that link to each of your 20 different websites is like going up to Google and saying, "hey google, look what I'm doing...I'm trying to get to page one for these keywords using grey-hat link manipulation". You probably won't be penalized....but the value of these links will be greatly diminished when google notices that all 20 websites have the same hosting, etc. I don't know exactly what your doing but be careful as these type of link-building strategies can take hours of your time and produce little/no results if done incorrectly.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6679392].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ownergolan
      Originally Posted by webalfie View Post

      Creating 20 web 2.0 properties that link to each of your 20 different websites is like going up to Google and saying, "hey google, look what I'm doing...I'm trying to get to page one for these keywords using grey-hat link manipulation". You probably won't be penalized....but the value of these links will be greatly diminished when google notices that all 20 websites have the same hosting, etc. I don't know exactly what your doing but be careful as these type of link-building strategies can take hours of your time and produce little/no results if done incorrectly.
      thats exactly what i was thinking, but for my MNS i wont open web 2.0 for each,
      so i thought this could be a solution, stil thinking about it.
      Signature
      "Aiyyo I'm gonna be on ti-dop, that's all my eyes can see..
      Ill put in work, and watch my status escalate"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6689101].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GSX
    With all this effort I'd create a small private network of sites and interlink them with all the necessary security.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[6679464].message }}

Trending Topics